Monday, December 21, 2015


Mystery Solved?

Quick, which is the better deal:

  1. Watch videos online and pay $649 for three credits.
  2. Take a class with a human being and pay $252 for three credits.

If you said “a,” congratulations -- you’re part of the one percent!

Last Spring, I asked in this venue exactly what problem ASU and EdX thought they were solving.  Now we have the first attempt at an answer.  According to over 99 percent of the students who signed up for a MOOC through the ASU/EdX partnership, they weren’t.  

That’s not necessarily a bad thing, of course.  To the extent that folks watched MOOCs in the same way that they watch, say, TED talks, I don’t see the harm in it.  But to the extent that the partnership was supposed to be about opening pathways to bachelor’s degrees, it doesn’t come close to comparing to the already-established route of starting at a community college -- in this case, I used the tuition rate of Maricopa Community College, the largest feeder to ASU -- and transferring.

The program didn’t even follow the usual “script” for “disruptive innovations.”  It came in at a higher cost than a respected, existing alternative.  That’s not how disruption is supposed to work.  I have to wonder at the implied invisibility of the single largest sector of American higher education, but that’s another discussion.  

ASU was essentially trying to charge premium prices for Prior Learning Assessment and hope nobody would notice.  A savvy student could simply watch the MOOC and then take a CLEP exam for credit for less than a hundred bucks.  I admire the audacity of the effort, though I admire more the clarity with which most people saw it.

I guess it’s possible to construct a scenario in which the partnership is a good deal.  Maybe it works well for the Starbucks employees who get a special deal with ASU.  I suspect Starbucks could get a better deal working with community colleges, but hey, it’s their money.  Outside of something relatively idiosyncratic, though, I’d be hard pressed to explain why a student wouldn’t be better off taking classes at a community college with an actual professor.

Wise and worldly readers, am I missing something here?  Is there a subtle wisdom to the arrangement that goes deeper than brazen overcharging?  

Program note: ‘tis the season, so the blog will go on its annual holiday hiatus until January 4.  Now if you’ll excuse me, I have an “ugly sweater” competition to win...

Have a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and enjoy whatever other holidays you celebrate over the solstice ... and good luck with the sweater competition!

My favorite part of the story was where a student would get their "identity-verified certificate" after passing the class. Did I read that right? It couldn't have been before they started, or it would cost $49 up front to take the class whether you passed or not. And as much as a year later? Not how we run our distance classes!

Agree 100% on the CLEP alternative. Or they could have actually been watching the videos as a supplement to a real astronomy course being taken at a CC. I already have students who use a mix of various videos out there to get an alternate take on my courses. I've got to remember to ask a colleague if they give their students a link to a MOOC or a play list that matches our curriculum.
"Wise and worldly readers, am I missing something here?"

You are missing the inconvenience of having to show up for class at a specific time and place. You may also be missing a perception of superior teaching in the MOOC.
Those planning to apply for payday credits ought to remember this ought to just be done when every other alternative have been depleted.
Snappy money with simple credit necessities are what makes payday advances alluring to many individuals. Be that as it may, preceding consenting to this sort of credit, ensure you know every one of
the subtle elements. The tips from this article will help you abstain from getting into inconvenience.

Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?