Tuesday, December 08, 2009


Battles You Don't Want to Fight

A savvy admin will pick battles carefully. I've seen too many cases of "you're right, but you're wrong to bring it up" over the years. So as a public service to any newbie administrators out there, I'll offer a few examples of battles you're really better off skipping, if you have the option.

1. The photocopier. You will never win the battle of the photocopier. Yes, Professor X will beat the poor thing into submission, running off copies like he has a grudge against trees. And yes, other professors who teach the exact same class will somehow manage not to. Yes, toner costs money, as does paper, and the environmental damage from excessive copying is real. But you will not win this one. I've seen too many deans or chairs come to grief trying to hold the line on copier costs. Prof. X will immediately leap to academic freedom, claiming that your inquiry into his thousands of copies is a thinly-veiled attack on his choice of instructional materials. Other faculty who normally think of Prof. X as a bit of a pain will rally to his side, out of fear that you'll start charging them by the page. No good can come of this. (Exception: if you have a department secretary who is longstanding, respected, and ferocious, s/he might be able to pull it off. But you won't.) The only concession I've seen successfully wrested on photocopying has been a grudging willingness to do double-sided, to save paper. If you get that, call it a win and move on.

2. "So-and-so doesn't attend the meetings of the committee he signed up for." This falls victim to the "what about everybody else" problem. Unless you're willing and able to do surveillance on every single committee, and to cross-reference every absence, you're typically best off leaving this one alone. Yes, it's unfair to the 'good soldiers,' but any system built on honor and discretion will have some holes in it. Given the distastefulness of the alternative, you're typically best advised to let this one slide. If the faculty want to own governance, let them own non-participation, too.

3. "It's unfair that Prof. X is such a harder grader than Prof. Y!" This is another of those "yes, but" situations. Yes, it's unfair (if/when it's true), but you don't want to go there. This is why colleges have Procedures. Refer the student to the Grade Appeal Process, and leave it at that. If there's a consistent stream of students about the same professor, talk to the department chair about grade norming workshops. But don't expect much. This one combines the academic freedom issue with the surveillance issue, making it a no-win twofer. Unless you can show a double standard based on some sort of identifiable discrimination, walk away. Professors are allowed to be strict. Don't take the bait.

4. The decades-old grievance. Let the past pass.

5. "Everybody knows." You'd be surprised how difficult it is to actually prove what "everybody knows" to be true. Widespread belief is not proof. Be prepared to be accused of condoning whatever it is that everybody knows. ("The Administration knows about it, but doesn't do anything!") In the absence of actual proof that you could defend in court, hearsay is just hearsay. In my observation, don't be surprised if the very people urging you to action scatter abruptly when asked to sign their names to a complaint. It's called cowardice. Walk away.

Wise and worldly readers -- what would you add?

As for item 3 on your list to avoid. I wonder how many students lost scholarships, drop majors, or simply left school after getting Professor X and alternatively how many students end up failing later more rigorous classes after getting a undeserved grade from professor Y?
The administrator's wife or ex-wife who's put in a special role despite being utterly unqualified and without the job being open for any applications.
"Can we define what the individual administrative support staff members actually do?" This is a pet peeve of mine--job shift and slide over time, as everyone accommodates staff member X who just doesn't like to do task C, even though it would typically be in her purview. Or staff member Y who will do task A for some faculty, but not for others.
Trying to force people to use PCs when they really want Macs and trying to force everyone to use the same operating system. Controling what people print out while they are at work (this is a variation on the copy machine problem).
How do you feel about office hours? Do they count if you are in your office with the door closed and the window papered over? Is that a battle you cannot win?

Issue #2 (skipping meetings) falls in your territory if specific service obligations are part of the assigned duties and participation is claimed in an end-of-year report. Then it becomes the same as skipping class.

My response when students complain to me about Issue #3 (hard grading by me or some other professor in something like calculus or physics) is a variant of what JimC wrote: You might wait until next semester, or next year, and see how those other students do in the next calculus or engineering class.

There is really only one thing worse than earning a D, and that is being given a C when you only deserved a D or F. You might find yourself stuck in a class that you cannot pass no matter how many times you repeat it, and you can't repeat the one you need to retake because you passed it.

PS to "Kate":
Did you want to know if DD used to run the place you are spamming for and just forgot to ask?
Maybe this is just the UK, but ANY discussions about car parking is guaranteed to bring out the worst in everybody....
Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?