Thursday, March 07, 2013


Friday Fragments

Bruce Leslie, the Chancellor of Alamo Colleges, has a provocative piece on the Huffington Post in which he foretells the end of community colleges.  While it’s easy to argue with this particular or that one, the point that resonates is that we need to move beyond the “mini-university” model.  

As I get older, I’m increasingly convinced that much of what gets explained, after the fact, as intentional was actually either accidental or the product of unthinking habit.  Community colleges were mostly established within a fairly narrow span of years, which coincided with the halcyon days of state universities.  Much of what we now assume to be “normal” dates from that period.  

The problem with unexamined assumptions is that when they get called into question, it feels like a rude shock.  People don’t always do their best work when recovering from a rude shock.

I’d venture to say that the future of community colleges hinges on the ability to recover from the shock and adapt to the new world.  The real threat is misguided reverence for the past.  The past was just as improvised as the present; we’ve just forgotten.


The Boy did us proud this week.  For purposes of this story, I’ll call his friend Sarah, because that is not her name.  He was at Sarah’s house -- our families are friendly -- when Sarah let slip that a boy in her school had texted her to ask her out.  She didn’t have any particular feeling about the boy, but she was thinking about saying yes just because she could.

TB responded thusly: “No class.  If a boy wants to ask you out, he should ask you to your face.”  

Sarah agreed, and dropped the idea.  Now Sarah’s Mom is TB’s biggest fan, and I’m fairly bursting with pride.  He encouraged Sarah to have higher standards, sending the message that she deserved to be treated with respect.  And he did it without coaching.  Go, TB!


 This is both brilliant and preposterous.  In response to the terrible job market for new lawyers, Arizona State’s law school is establishing its own firm to hire its own graduates.  In a sense, it’s a sort of postdoc for lawyers.  The schools are trying to sell the idea as a legal analog to a teaching hospital.

In the very short term, it’s a way for a school to goose its own placement rates.  And on a pragmatic level, for a new graduate, so-so work is better than no work at all.  But I can’t help but read it as a sort of admission of defeat.  Teaching hospitals and lab science postdoc positions have economic models that make sense.  These don’t.  Anything is possible, but this just looks like a holding action, or a way to manage decline.  Is there something I’m missing?


My sympathies to everyone at Manchester Community College in Connecticut.  It had quite a scare this week.   


Finally some good news.  Yes, many new college grads are underemployed, but relatively few of them are actually unemployed.  And they’re still far better off in the job market with a degree than without one.


This weekend I’m heading to Dallas for the League for Innovation conference.  Any wise and worldly readers who’ll be there are invited to my panel on Sunday morning (!), or to drop me a line at deandad (at) gmail (dot) com to meet.  Never having been to Dallas, I’m open to any culinary suggestions...

I'm struck by a side note about TBs great story. Back in our day, wouldn't we have to talk first simply to get the phone number to call?
"League for Innovation," huh? I know nothing about it, and it may well be a substantive conference that facilitates useful dialogue and generates practical new ideas , but I have to admit my first reaction is that it sounds like it was named by someone who never quite outgrew wanting to be a superhero. I hope it will, in fact, be a productive meeting of reality-based lifeforms.
Kudos to TB. I hope my own eleven-year-old Sarah (who _is_ named Sarah) will get such good counsel from her friends, and that she'll be open to it.

As for ASU's Bold Move, well, as a graduate of there, what can I say? The school is trying to rebrand as "the new american university" and this may well be part of the realistic future. Note that it's law grads we're talking about here, not the humanities/liberal arts types!
I think ASU's "law firm" makes sense on a couple of levels; most usefully, it will give recent law grads (who typically have no practical experience) some experience actually practicing law. This may help their employment chances(some smaller firms will only hire lawyers with experience because they don't have time to train them), or it may help them open their own firm.

Surely 11 year olds aren't dating?

And if it wasn't a date then what is wrong with friends asking friends out by text?

Thanks for such social platform which give us variety of idea to explore ourself technically .This exposure give benefits to everyone to fit or to survive in global market which is very essential in the global era.
Time Attendance Software In Pune

Thanks for such social platform which give us variety of idea to explore ourself technically .This exposure give benefits to everyone to fit or to survive in global market which is very essential in the global era.
Time Attendance Software In Pune

RE: 11 year olds dating. When I used to teach 11 year olds, someone's parent took them to get ice cream or they ate together in the cafeteria, and they used to "go with" someone, but didn't go anywhere. They just said that. Then the next week they changed who they "broke up".

Way to go TB, though.
Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?